Student Film Reviews

Film reviews from theaters, couches, and film festivals

Home | All Reviews | Festival Courses | Film and Media Studies | SBCC | | Log in

1. Andrea Vazquez 02.24.10 / 11am

   The critic starts off well with the opening sentence. This review has a lot of grammar errors. In the second sentence there should be commas placed after ‘film’ and after ‘ghosts’. In that same sentence ‘ghosts’ should be capitalized since it is part of the name of the movie. The third sentence seems to be missing something and the fourth sentence I do not think is a sentence. The fifth sentence also lacks a comma after ‘Impertoli’ and after ‘characters’. The last paragraphs second sentence begins with ‘And’. The critic is very short and overall this review is not a very good one.
2. Joanna Moreno 03.01.10 / 3pm

   the critic’s review is basic and a bit negative which makes sense if the story indeed had no plot or strong story line besides just the fact that the story bounced back and forth . If s story bounces back and forth i think it should rather be considered cause and effect or conflict and resolution which sometimes keep the story interesting or the audience un-bias to which character to root for. This movie and its critics should as well focus on this history of impertoili and his former work as a actor , writer, director simply to see where he is coming from and which message he is trying to convey onto the audience as well as critics. Impertoli is best known for his work as a actor so us as viewers and critics should see this as the begging of something that either can expand or wont but it is important to focus in which direction Impertoli’s career has the potential to expand. although the story line is not original and we have seen many films about these same subjects we have to ask ourselves did Impertoli make this film different than the rest? more enriched with emotion?.

Home | SBCC | Class Schedule | Film and Media Studies

Contact: Prof. Nico MaestuCopyright 2007-23 Log in